In re Ormsby, 591 F.3d 1199 (9th Cir. 2010). The debtor argued that summary judgment was inappropriate because a state court judgement against debtor for larceny should not preclude debtor from contending that debtor did not commit larceny within the federal definition of the term. The 9th Circuit disagreed and held that summary judgment against debtor was appropriate because the state court judgment was sufficient to preclude relitigation of whether debtor's conduct meets the requirements of Section 523(a)(4).
The court cited Collier on Bankruptcy, which states that for purposes of Section 523(a)(4), a bankruptcy court is not bound by the state law definition of larceny but, rather, may follow federal common law, which defines larceny as a "felonious taking of another's personal property with intent to convert it or deprived the owner of the same."
The 9th Circuit determined that it was not bound to the state court's judgment. Nevertheless, the 9th Circuit found that the state court judgment provided enough information to determine that debtor's action amounted to fraud, since "intent may properly be inferred from the totality of the circumstances and the conduct of the person accused. Citing Kaye v. Rose (In re rose), 934 F.2d 901, 904 (7th Cir. 1991).
Your Bankruptcy Advisor Blog
By: Attorney Robert Schaller (Bob's bio) of the Schaller Law Firm
Click for Bankruptcy Lawyer Job Opportunities. You are invited to contact Attorney Schaller at 630-655-1233 or visit his website at Discharging Student Loans to learn about how the bankruptcy laws can help you. Bob is a member of the National Bankruptcy College Attorney Network, American Bankruptcy Institute and the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys.
For information about Chapter 7 bankruptcy Click Here
For information about Chapter 13 bankruptcy Click Here
NOTE: Robert Schaller looks forward to the opportunity to talk with you about your legal issues. But please remember that all information on this blog is for advertising and general informational purposes only. Please read Bob's disclaimer. I recommend that you review a few other blogs that may be of interest to you. These blogs are identified in the right column and are set forth below: bankruptcy issues blog; bankruptcy and family law issues blog; bankruptcy and employment issues blog; adversary defense blog; and bankruptcy and student loan issues blog.
Sunday, May 23, 2010
When does a state court judgment for Larceny Satisfy Section 523(a)(4)?
Posted by Attorney Robert Schaller at 9:33 PM
Labels: Section 523(a)(4)
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
I always check this type of advisory post and I found your article which is related to my interest. This is a great way to increase knowledge for us. Thanks for sharing an article like this.minnesota debt settlement lawReplyDelete
This individual ought to have a strong foundation and the right accreditations to deal with your case. Learn about these subtleties on the web or on a book then, at that point, begin searching for lawyers accessible. medical malpractice lawyers free consultationReplyDelete
lawyers specializing in medical malpractice
هل تريد استشارة محامي جدة عبر منصة محامين جدة المتخصصة بالشأن القانوني ؟ سجل استشارتك الآن عبر الواتس اب. وسيتم مراجعتها ثم عرضها على المحامين للرد على موضوعكم. استشارة محامي جدةReplyDelete
محامي عقارات في جدة إذا كنت تبحث عن محامي محترف وكفء مختص في قضايا العقارات داخل مدينة جدة. فقد تعاني من مشقة البحث؛ نظرًا لقلة المحامين في هذا الاختصاص القانوني. محامي عقارات في جدةReplyDelete
Right up 'til today the print business catalog contain a lot of beautiful, one page show advertisements that include legal counselors offering their administrations, and legal advisors pay a ton for these promotions.NYC Injury lawyerReplyDelete