Monday, May 17, 2010

Section 523(a)(2)(A): Fraud

Section 523(a)(2)(A) excepts for discharge any debt for money to the extent obtained by "actual fraud." The term “actual fraud” means common law fraud. A creditor must show that the debtor’s actions were purposefully deceptive or misleading. Courts infer requirements establishing intent, reliance and materiality.



To provide that a debtor committed "actual fraud," the objecting creditor must show the following: (1) a representation made by debtor to the objecting creditor; (2) debtor’s knowledge of the falsity when the representation was made; (3) debtor’s intent to deceive in making such representation; (4) creditor’s justifiable reliance; and (5) creditor’s damage as a result. A creditor must plead and prove each element of fraud in order to sustain a finding that a debt is nondischargeable, including intent on the part of the debtor to deceive at the time the debt was created.



For a breach of contract to result in a nondischargeable debt, the objecting party must prove that debtor misrepresented debtor’s intention to perform contractual duties, which may be inferred if the debtor failed to begin performance.



In cases involving contractor-debtors, there are generally two ways to prove fraud or misrepresentation. First, the creditor could show that the debtor entered into the contract with the intent of never complying with the terms; or second, the creditor could show that debtor intentionally misrepresented a material fact or qualification when soliciting or obtaining the work.



when determining whether a contractor committed fraud in connection with a construction project, the question pivots on whether during the negotiations the contractor induced the property owner into signing the contract by making material false representations, like promising to obtain the necessary permits or overstating the contractor’s qualifications. Substandard performance or a mere breach of the construction contract does not rise to the level of fraud necessary to except the debt from discharge.
 
Warmest Regards,

Bob Schaller

Your Bankruptcy Advisor

Blog By: Attorney Robert Schaller (Bob's bio) of the Schaller Law Firm Click for Bankruptcy Lawyer Job Opportunities. You are invited to contact Attorney Schaller at 630-655-1233 or visit his website at Discharging Student Loans to learn about how the bankruptcy laws can help you. Bob is a member of the National Bankruptcy College Attorney Network, American Bankruptcy Institute and the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys. For information about Chapter 7 bankruptcy Click Here
For information about Chapter 13 bankruptcy Click Here NOTE: Robert Schaller looks forward to the opportunity to talk with you about your legal issues. But please remember that all information on this blog is for advertising and general informational purposes only. Please read Bob's disclaimer. I recommend that you review a few other blogs that may be of interest to you. These blogs are identified in the right column and are set forth below: bankruptcy issues blog; bankruptcy and family law issues blog; bankruptcy and employment issues blog; adversary defense blog; and bankruptcy and student loan issues blog.

3 comments:

  1. Kim thanks these gangrene guys have excluded real green folks from access to government funds. Their exposure will help clean up the environment and free up funds for honest folks with green projects. qui tam lawyer

    ReplyDelete
  2. Our notoriety in regions of genuine wrongdoing and complex misrepresentation has brought about extortion masters being prescribed by numerous different experts, for example, bookkeepers and other legitimate firms. London Polygraph

    ReplyDelete
  3. Each lie identification tests utilize and psycho-physiology and logical technique. Polygraph is acknowledged in court for a few states in the US. There are organizations who offer lie identification test in Los Angeles and polygraph test in Los Angeles. http://www.liedetectortestusa.com

    ReplyDelete